Hawk Academy · Pilot 1 · Decision Required

Workshop Roadblock.
Three ways forward.

Melbourne pilot is 35 days out. Ads are drafted but not live. The "3 live pages by lunch" promise is sitting on a CMS variance problem we have to solve before we spend a dollar on traffic.

June 11-12, 2026 30 seats per city $3,500 per attendee Tailfeather: $4,000 max refund per failure

00 / Shared goal

We all want the same thing.

Before we get into the problem and the options, the baseline everyone in the room agrees on:

Successful workshops

The room delivers. Attendees leave with what they came for.

Good experience

Pilot 1 is the case study. It has to feel right end-to-end.

Makes money

$3,500 × 30 seats × 5 cities. The economics matter.

Minimal refunds

Tailfeather is real. Every refund is $4,000 plus a reputational hit.

Everything below — the problem, the testing reality, the three options — is in service of those four. The question isn't whether the workshop happens. It's which path gives us all four with the highest confidence.

01 / The problem

We promised three pages live. Reality is messy.

The qualification framework, the VSL, the agenda, and the ad copy don't all agree on who walks in the room. Even within "WordPress" there are 6 page builders that behave differently.

!

Mixed-platform attendees can't be solved with one template

Some applicants are on WordPress + Divi. Others are on Neto, Shopify, Wix, Webflow, or custom builds. We can't pre-build a template that publishes cleanly across all of those in a 75-minute working session.

!

The "3 pages live" guarantee carries $4,000 of risk per failure

Tailfeather Guarantee = full refund + $500 travel. A 10% failure rate across 30 seats = $12,000 in refunds plus the reputational damage of "the workshop didn't deliver" on Pilot 1.

!

35 days isn't enough to template across every platform

Even within WordPress: Elementor, Divi, Bricks, Oxygen, Beaver Builder, Gutenberg all behave differently. Building, testing and coach-training across all of them by June 11 is unrealistic.

i

One thing in our favour: ads aren't live yet

Creative is drafted but no spend has gone out. Pivoting the message has zero sunk cost. Whatever we decide here, we can shape the ad funnel around it.

02 / Testing reality

What we found when we actually tried it.

The original idea was clean. Testing has surfaced a scale problem that doesn't show up at sample size = 1.

The pitch

"Claude Code can do it for us."

We're basically doing light dev — the Hawk OS plugin handles structure, Claude handles content, attendee clicks publish. Three pages, 75 minutes, done.

Yes it can. The constraint is time.

Claude Code can build these pages. Testing confirms the capability. What it needs is time — time to iterate, time to QA, time to make sure what goes live is actually good. Not just published, but good enough to send a real customer to.

One person at their own pace, working through the residual HTML tweaks, gets there. The workshop format collapses that timeline.

What we actually have

A few hours. Before lunch. The deadline is in the contract, the deliverable is in the contract, the variance is in the room.

Even using our plugin solution, every site we tested needed heavy HTML tweaking — theme overrides, missing CSS classes, plugin conflicts, weird host caching. Fine if it's one person iterating. But we're talking 30 people, potentially 30 different website builds, all needing live debugging inside the same window.

The math: 30 attendees × ~3 pages × residual dev time per page against a hard "before lunch" wall. Without narrowing the build environment hard, the math doesn't close.

The bottleneck, named

Each WordPress page builder + theme combo is its own micro-platform. Elementor-only is the one combination where we can ship a pre-built template and let Claude handle the residual cases inside the time we have. Everything else needs case-by-case dev work, and case-by-case doesn't scale to 30 simultaneous attendees against a lunch deadline.

03 / The three ways forward

Pick a lane.

OPTION 1

WordPress only.
Pages go live.

01
Confidence Low → Medium*

*Lifts to Medium only if we lock the room to Elementor-only so we can pre-build a real template. Otherwise theme + page-builder variance keeps it Low.

Move forward with the ads. Filter the room down to WordPress sites only. Commit to publishing 3 pages on the attendee's actual site Day 1. Trust Claude + the team to fill the gaps in the room.

What's preserved

The 3-pages-live guarantee

The current VSL + ad creative direction

The "we build on YOUR site" differentiator

What's dropped

Ecom audience (deferred to Pilot 2)

Shopify, Wix, Webflow, custom builds

Risks

WordPress still has 6 page builders. Variance not eliminated.

75-min build target untested at scale.

Theme overrides + plugin conflicts are unpredictable.

What we'd do

  • Tighten qualification: WordPress self-hosted only
  • Pick one or two page builders, build the template
  • T-7 site audit on every attendee
  • Trust the team + Claude to handle weird cases live

OPTION 2

Any CMS.
Pages go live.

02
Confidence Low

Move forward with the ads. Open the room to any business, any CMS. Commit to pages going live regardless of platform. Prepare what we can. Hope for the best.

What's preserved

The 3-pages-live guarantee

Maximum signup volume

Original VSL (incl. ecom skincare case)

What's dropped

Predictability of the Day 1 outcome

Ability to template-prep ahead of time

Risks

Neto / custom platforms can break the room.

$4K refund risk per failed attendee × ~30.

Reputational damage if Pilot 1 doesn't deliver.

Coach training has to cover every CMS — impossible in 35 days.

What we'd do

  • Keep the existing filter open
  • Prep templates for the top 3 CMSes
  • Hope no one shows up on Neto / custom
  • Burn coach hours on day-of triage

OPTION 3

Pivot the ads.
Skills + workflows.

03
Confidence Mid-to-high

Edit the ads + VSL to drop the page guarantee. Don't touch attendee websites. Teach SEO tactics, Claude workflows, and the Hawk OS system. Web Profit Academy model: skills transfer in the room, not site changes.

What's preserved

Predictable outcome regardless of platform

Open audience: ecom + B2B + any CMS

Zero risk of breaking attendee sites

Hawk OS skills transfer + 6mo support intact

What's dropped

"3 pages live by lunch" promise

"We build on YOUR site" differentiator

Risks

Closer to free Hawk Academy course in feel.

Need a new $3,500 differentiator (proximity, support, certification).

Ad recut required (cheap — they're drafted).

What we'd do

  • Recut ads + VSL: drop page guarantee
  • Open the room: any CMS, any business type
  • Build curriculum around Claude + SEO skills
  • Workshop = skills, workflows, Hawk OS handover
  • Demos on a Hawk-controlled sandbox site

04 / Side-by-side

At a glance.

Option 1
WP only, pages live
Option 2
Any CMS, pages live
Option 3
Pivot to skills
Confidence Mid-to-low Low Mid-to-high
Page guarantee preserved Yes Yes No
Audience scope B2B service, WordPress only Any business, any CMS Any business, any CMS
Touch attendee websites? Yes Yes No
Ads need recutting Light tweaks only No changes Yes (drafted, free)
$4K refund risk per attendee Medium High Low
Differentiation vs free Hawk Academy Strong (live build on your site) Strong (live build on your site) Needs new framing (proximity, support)
Realistic in 35-day runway? Tight No Yes
Maximum signup ceiling Narrow filter, fewer signups Wide filter, max signups Wide filter, max signups

05 / What happens next

Decision tree.

IF WE PICK OPTION 1 — WORDPRESS ONLY

Tighten the filter, prep the template, hope it holds.

Mid-to-low confidence

Recut ads light. Add WordPress qualifier. Reject non-WP applicants.

Pick 1-2 page builders (Elementor + Gutenberg). Build template once.

T-7 audit every attendee. Greenlight or move them out.

Day 1: 30 attendees, 30 sites, 90 pages to publish in 75 minutes. Coaches in the room.

If it works: The page guarantee delivers. Pilot 1 hits the brochure promise. Validates the model for Pilot 2.
If it breaks: 1-2 broken sites become Tailfeather refunds. Pilot 2 has to course-correct.

IF WE PICK OPTION 2 — ANY CMS

Open the doors, pray nothing weird walks in.

Low confidence

Run the ads as drafted. Accept any CMS, any business type.

Try to prep templates for WordPress + Shopify + maybe one more.

Hope the Neto / Wix / custom-build attendees fall outside the filter naturally.

Day 1: triage in real time. Coaches improvise across 5+ platforms.

If it works: Lucky room composition. The few odd-platform attendees take it on the chin. Pilot 1 ships.
If it breaks: Multiple Tailfeather refunds. The room sees other attendees fail. Bad case study. Pilot 2 fundamentally has to change.

IF WE PICK OPTION 3 — PIVOT TO SKILLS

Recut, reposition, deliver predictable value.

Mid-to-high confidence

Recut ads + VSL: remove the "3 pages live" promise. New differentiator: proximity, Hawk OS handover, 6mo support.

Open the filter to any business, any CMS.

Curriculum: Claude + SEO workflows, keyword research, content architecture, EEAT, AI Search optimisation, GSC + GA4.

Day 1: skill transfer + workflow demos on a Hawk-controlled sandbox. Day 2: attendees apply to their own businesses with coach support, not live publishing.

If it works: Predictable delivery. No platform surprises. Tailfeather refunds zero. Wide audience. Reusable across cities. Pilot 2 runs the same playbook with iteration.
If it breaks: Attendees feel it's "just a course." Differentiator vs free Hawk Academy isn't strong enough at $3,500. Need to bolt on a new value prop (e.g. certified coach session, done-for-you element).

06 / Decision

What are we doing?

Pick the lane. Lock the ads. Brief Charbel, brief the team. The next 35 days run off whatever we choose right here.